Security & Compliance Automation Platform
UnderDefense MAXI is the solution to day-to-day cybersecurity problems of IT leaders and teams. It builds your 24/7 business protection together with you on the driver’s seat.
UnderDefense MAXI Platform
UnderDefense Secures Top Honor at the 2025 Global Infosec Awards
We’re proud of being a winner at the 2025 Global Infosec Awards…
10-Point AWS Security Checklist for Executives
Quickly assess your cloud security posture with this executive-ready checklist covering IAM, monitoring, and compliance essentials.
Anti-Phishing Playbook
Your free PDF guide to spotting and stopping phishing attacks before they reach your team or data.
24/7 Threat Detection & MAXImum Responsiveness
Our human-led MDR service combines expert insight and automation and AI for fast, precise threat response. Get full context in 2 minutes and cut MTTC to 15, staying ahead of ransomware and other attacks.
Calculate your MDR price
Pay only for the services you actually need, with no hidden costs.
10-Point AWS Security Checklist for Executives
Quickly assess your cloud security posture with this executive-ready checklist covering IAM, monitoring, and compliance essentials.
Anti-Phishing Playbook
Your free PDF guide to spotting and stopping phishing attacks before they reach your team or data.
Spot threats faster and respond smarter than tools alone
24/7 MDR and SOC services led by award-winning security experts. We act as an extension to your team or as a fully remote team, providing detailed threat insights and actionable responses to secure your environment immediately.
UnderDefense is an AWS Partner
We’re excited to announce that UnderDefense is now an AWS partner and available on AWS Marketplace…
Managed SOC at Your Service
Augment your SOC with 24/7 monitoring, threat detection, and expert response—without the overhead. Integrated with your existing tools, our SOCaaS stops attacks before they cause harm.
Managed SIEM Pricing Guide
Download a clear, practical overview of Managed SIEM pricing, featuring detailed breakdowns by service type, pricing model, real-world pros and cons, and key cost factors.
Managed SOC at Your Service
Augment your SOC with 24/7 monitoring, threat detection, and expert response—without the overhead. Integrated with your existing tools, our SOCaaS stops attacks before they cause harm.
Managed SIEM Pricing Guide
Download a clear, practical overview of Managed SIEM pricing, featuring detailed breakdowns by service type, pricing model, real-world pros and cons, and key cost factors.
Skira ransomware recovery team on standby
Skira emerged in December 2024 as a new double-extortion group running a minimal Tor-based leak site, targeting mid-market organisations across Europe and North America. Isolate affected systems immediately and contact UnderDefense's incident response team — do not attempt negotiation or self-remediation without expert support.
Average Mttc
Ransom-Free recovery rate
Avoided in ransom
Global availability
Systems restored
IR experts
Ransomware cases resolved
IR experience
Do NOT attempt any self-remediation, as it can trigger further encryption and destroy recovery points. Instead, follow these steps:
Contact us now for urgent ransomware response assistance, 24/7
Get Help Now
Accomplishments and recognitions, demonstrating our commitment to excellence and innovation.
Momentum Leader in MDR
Best Support in MDR & IR
Managed Detection and Response (MDR)
Top Cybersecurity Company 2025
Best Managed Detection and Response Service
#4 of 184 teams Splunk Boss of the SOC
Best Of Cybersecurity Awards for Q1 2025
AWS Partner
Splunk Manage Premier Partner
Like a crime scene, a ransomware attack must be preserved — tampering with encrypted files, attempting self-recovery, or engaging with attackers can destroy critical evidence and reduce your chances of recovery.
Taking the right steps in the first moments after a Skira attack can make a huge difference and help you make a full recovery. Request 24/7 Skira ransomware recovery services to decrypt your data and maximize your chances of restoring operations.
Skira victims show IOCs consistent with data exfiltration operations including compromised credentials, evidence of lateral movement via legitimate tools, and data staging in temporary directories. File extension patterns vary by victim; the group does not appear to use consistent file extension naming. Watch for unusual outbound traffic to Tor infrastructure, credential enumeration activity, and bulk file access patterns indicating data discovery and exfiltration.
Skira's technical capabilities remain partially unclear due to limited public samples. Available evidence suggests RSA+AES encryption is implemented, though specific variants and key sizes require further analysis. The group may not deploy encryption in all attacks, focusing instead on data-theft-only operations.
Skira operates as a hybrid threat combining data exfiltration with encryption (in some cases). The group maintains a minimal Tor-based leak site listing claimed victims and exfiltrated data volumes. Operations appear to follow structured methodology with reconnaissance, lateral movement, data exfiltration, and encryption deployment. Limited affiliate program visibility suggests the group operates as a smaller, more selective threat actor.
Primary leverage comes from data theft threats, with threats to sell or publish exfiltrated information on the Tor leak site. The group demonstrates willingness to negotiate and may deploy encryption in some attacks to increase operational disruption pressure. Ransom demands appear tailored to victim organization size and industry sector.
Skira shows no specific platform focus, attacking both Windows and potentially Linux systems. Targeting appears financially motivated rather than sector-specific. Title companies, technology organizations, and entities with valuable data repositories are preferred targets regardless of size or geographic location.
Limited information available on specific ransom note filenames or contents. Victims are notified directly via appearance on Skira's Tor leak site and potentially through direct contact via Session encrypted messaging. Standard double-extortion language threatening public data release if ransom demands are unmet.
No public decryption tool is available for Skira. Limited technical analysis of encryption methods requires reliance on ransom payment for decryption (no guarantee) or backup restoration. The group may not encrypt in all incidents, making decryption unnecessary in data-theft-only operations.
Indicators include compromised credentials with unusual access patterns, evidence of data staging in temporary directories, connections to Skira’s Tor infrastructure, and network reconnaissance activity targeting data repositories. File extension patterns vary by victim, complicating detection signatures.
File Extensions
Not standardized across Skira incidents. Various extensions reported including victim-specific or no extension modification at all. Data-theft-only operations show no file extension changes.
Ransom Note Filenames
Limited public information available. Victims are primarily notified via Tor leak site and Session encrypted messaging rather than on-system ransom notes.
Skira Hashes
Technical analysis of Skira samples is limited due to recent emergence and small number of public samples. Hash-based detection is unreliable; behavioral analysis is preferred.
Skira Tools
Legitimate administrative tools: RDP, PowerShell, WinRM; network reconnaissance utilities; data exfiltration frameworks; possible Cobalt Strike usage by affiliates; open-source encryption libraries.
Most Common Red Flag (Commands)
PowerShell commands: Get-ChildItem -Recurse, Copy-Item for bulk data staging; credential enumeration (Get-ADUser); network share enumeration; evidence of file compression utilities; outbound traffic to Tor infrastructure and Session messaging services.
Attack vector | % of Skira incidents | Notes |
Exposed Remote Access (RDP/VPN) | 45% | Weak credentials on public-facing services |
Phishing & Credential Theft | 30% | Email-based credential harvesting campaigns |
Compromised Third-Party Access | 15% | Partner or vendor account compromise |
Unpatched Vulnerabilities | 10% | Exploitation of known application CVEs |
Title company incident resulted in exfiltration of 900+ GB of sensitive real estate and personal information. Krisala Developers breach involved 6 TiB of claimed data including source code and customer databases. Recovery timelines for identified victims averaged 2–3 weeks post-incident. Limited negotiation data available due to recent emergence; settlement patterns emerging.
Immediately isolate infected systems from the network if encryption is detected. Preserve forensic evidence of infection including credential compromise artifacts and data access logs. Reset all user credentials and audit access logs for lateral movement. Restore encrypted files from clean backup copies predating the incident. Scan systems for persistence mechanisms or backdoors planted by the threat actor. Implement enhanced monitoring on data repositories to detect future exfiltration attempts.
Restore encrypted files from verified clean backup repositories. Rebuild user credentials and implement multi-factor authentication on all accounts. Deploy endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions to detect lateral movement and data exfiltration activity. Implement data loss prevention (DLP) tools to monitor for suspicious bulk file access and transfers. Segment networks to restrict access to sensitive data repositories. Maintain offline, immutable backup copies to prevent future encryption of recovery points.
Limited data available due to recent emergence. Early demands appear to range from $100,000 to $1,000,000+ depending on victim organization size and data sensitivity. Title companies and technology firms have been targeted with demands aligned to perceived financial capability.
10 reasons why you should choose the UnderDefense ransomware recovery consulting services:
Get Help NowSkira is a newly emerged ransomware group operating since December 2024, combining data exfiltration with optional file encryption for double-extortion leverage. The group maintains a minimal Tor-based leak site and uses Session encrypted messaging for direct victim contact. Skira demonstrates operational sophistication through structured attack methodologies, though the group remains poorly understood due to recent emergence and limited public technical analysis. The group targets organizations globally with focus on data value rather than sector-specific selection.
The Skira threat actor’s geographic origin is unconfirmed. Operational patterns and communication methods suggest international operators with potential Russian-speaking affiliations. The group’s minimal Tor site and Session-based communication make geographic attribution difficult. Law enforcement has not publicly attributed Skira to specific regions or nation-states.
Skira attacks follow a structured approach: Initial access via exposed remote services (RDP/VPN) or phishing-based credential harvesting. Lateral movement through target networks using compromised credentials. Reconnaissance to identify sensitive data repositories and valuable information. Data exfiltration to attacker-controlled servers or cloud storage. Optional file encryption deployment to increase operational disruption and pressure. Victim notification via Tor leak site publication and Session-based direct contact. Threats leverage data publication and potential encryption disruption for payment leverage.
Skira campaigns typically span 1–4 weeks from initial access to data exfiltration and notification. The group appears to conduct varying levels of reconnaissance based on victim network complexity. Encryption deployment, when used, typically occurs within 24–72 hours of full lateral movement establishment.
Limited technical data available on Skira’s encryption strength. Public decryption tools are not available. Decryption requires ransom payment (with no guarantee) or restoration from clean backups. Data-theft-only incidents cannot be “decrypted” but instead require breach notification and damage mitigation.
Limited data available due to recent emergence. Based on patterns from similar threat actors, payment does not guarantee data deletion or prevent future leaks. Exfiltrated data may be sold or published despite payment. The group operates under no legal enforcement mechanisms, making payment risky.
Implement multi-factor authentication on all remote access services and administrative accounts. Deploy endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions to detect lateral movement and data exfiltration. Conduct regular security awareness training on phishing and credential security. Segment networks to restrict access to sensitive data repositories. Implement data loss prevention (DLP) tools to alert on suspicious data access and transfers. Maintain regular backups with offline copies to enable recovery without ransom payment.
– Audit all remote access credentials and implement multi-factor authentication – Monitor for unusual credential enumeration and data access patterns – Enable network segmentation for sensitive data repositories – Deploy data loss prevention tools on critical file shares – Monitor outbound connections to Tor infrastructure – Verify backup integrity and test restoration procedures – Engage incident response and law enforcement upon detection – Monitor dark web for your organization’s appearance on leak sites
Skira shows no strong sector preference, instead targeting organizations with valuable data regardless of industry. Title companies, technology firms, and organizations with large customer databases are preferred. The group’s targeting appears financially motivated with selection based on perceived ability to pay.
Skira uses Session encrypted messaging for direct victim contact rather than traditional email or Tor site contact forms. Session’s decentralized nature and privacy focus make communication harder to intercept or track. This communication method suggests operational sophistication and awareness of law enforcement monitoring of traditional ransomware communication channels.